Since there is also a lot of hatred for Chinese in America, I thought I’d take that and see if the words apply to chinese people. My goal is not to besmirch or belittle the goals of defining and preventing anti-semitism. But I have often wondered why Chinese people are not protected like Jewish people? Why can elected official get on TV and say “Chinese steal our stuff” but never can they say “Jews steal our stuff.” Circumstantially, sure it might not be necessary because Israel is a closer aly of US than China, but still, those words ring evil in my ears. So here it is the Chinese version of anti-semitism. In two forms, since I don’t know the right modernization of latin or greek names for Chinese.

—————————————————————-
Antisinoism
“Antisinoism is a certain perception of Chinese, which may be expressed as hatred toward Chinese. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisinoism are directed toward Chinese or non-Chinese individuals and/or their property, toward Chinese community institutions and religious facilities.”

To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:

Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of China, conceived as a Chinese collectivity. However, criticism of China similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisinotic. Antisinoism frequently charges Chinese with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Chinese for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.

Contemporary examples of antisinoism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Chinese in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.  Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Chinese as such or the power of Chinese as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Chinese conspiracy or of Chinese controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.  Accusing Chinese as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Chinese person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Chinese.  Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Chinese people at the hands of imperial Japan and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust Accusing the Chinese as a people, or China as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.  Accusing Chinese citizens of being more loyal to China, or to the alleged priorities of Chinese worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.  Denying the Chinese people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of China is a racist endeavor.  Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.  Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisinoism (e.g., claims of Chinese killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize China or Chinese.  Drawing comparisons of contemporary Chinese policy to that of the Nazis.  Holding Chinese collectively responsible for actions of the state of China.  Antisinotic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisinotic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisinotic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Chinese or linked to Chinese.

Antisinotic discrimination is the denial to Chinese of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
—————————————————————-
Antiseresism
“Antiseresism is a certain perception of Chinese, which may be expressed as hatred toward Chinese. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antiseresism are directed toward Chinese or non-Chinese individuals and/or their property, toward Chinese community institutions and religious facilities.”

To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:

Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of China, conceived as a Chinese collectivity. However, criticism of China similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antiseresic. Antiseresism frequently charges Chinese with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Chinese for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs seresister stereotypes and negative character traits.

Contemporary examples of antiseresism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Chinese in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.  Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Chinese as such or the power of Chinese as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Chinese conspiracy or of Chinese controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.  Accusing Chinese as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Chinese person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Chinese.  Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Chinese people at the hands of imperial Japan and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust Accusing the Chinese as a people, or China as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.  Accusing Chinese citizens of being more loyal to China, or to the alleged priorities of Chinese worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.  Denying the Chinese people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of China is a racist endeavor.  Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.  Using the symbols and images associated with classic antiseresism (e.g., claims of Chinese killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize China or Chinese.  Drawing comparisons of contemporary Chinese policy to that of the Nazis.  Holding Chinese collectively responsible for actions of the state of China.
Antiseresic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antiseresic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antiseresic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Chinese or linked to Chinese.

Antiseresic discrimination is the denial to Chinese of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
—————————————————————-
Superficially reading it, aside from being accused of killing Jesus, everything else is still relevant. There are people who hate Chinese. There are definitely denial of Holocaust in China whenever Chinese people talk about war evils done by Nazi Japan–or accusations of exaggerating thereof. Chinese Communists are frequently compared with Nazis, especially in front of the Chinese. Fear of Chinese loyalty to the China the country(countries). There is frequent and official characterization that the State of China is racist against Muslims. etc.

What do you think? The wishes of anti-anti-semites, with exception of Jesus and Germany(Japan), almost entirely align with the wishes of anti-anti-sinoics and anti-anti-seres.