I’m reading my post on BLM, on the day that Roe v. Wade is over turned by the Supreme Court. My SMS is abuzz with requests from my governor, senator and president tot air action (donate $) to fix this wrong.
I’m honest on the fence about this. I remember a very bubbly social studies teacher in 7th grade explaining to me for the first time the significance of Roe V. Wade. (She also ran the high school cheerleader squad) it was the norm in Pennsylvania to present both side all in one lesson. She was pro-choice, however, when challenged by my classmate who seem to be in the knows, she had to back down and acknowledge that pro-life has significant merits. (Man, talk about indoctrination, these prepubescent boys were taught that new lives are more valuable than girl’s choice) There were a lot of Churches in Pennsylvania. My dad even took after King Richard and tried the Kingdom Hall.🤪Seriously though, they only learn from the Bible, real teachings of Jesus Christ… better than everyone else who don’t do that, these were some devout folks we met.
There is certainly a problem of practical enforcement d monitoring of metric that we may value. For example, I mentioned only BLM post that we should approach racial justice with a reasonable mind. We cannot start by saying every white American man is part of a scheme to hurt minorities here. But I am immediately attacked by unlimited amount of evidence that that’s all they do. Some of these evidence maybe true, some of it may be circumstantial. The reality of our world is that we humans do need to update our believes and behaviors in response to our externalities. The challenge is that often, we do not have a commonly accepted metric for fairness, or freedom. So we resort to the simplest predicate for our brains to evaluate: are we equal?
My past work had proposed QIM, BETAM fairness, and action spaces. In the prior, we sought out a way to achieve a population-wide equality by using quadratic loss on the measurable metric of service. (Service was all the craze back then, so I casted government as a governance service side by side with employer as an employment service…) In BETAM equality, we set the mental expectation in our populace, the ETA of complete equality in a metric of import. Note, although we use statistical expectation in the calculations, it is meant to help the human participants understand what they should expect to happen, or even what they should try to make happen. Finally, our analysis of action spaces available to each individual reveals that there actually is an objective measure of freedom—the size of one’s action space. In the end, we reach equality, fairness and freedom of a higher level than what founders of our country was able to write in sciences they had. We still reach for equality, fairness, and liberty. Only now we have the ability to measure them over an entire population. We have the ability to plan and communicate realistic progress of these measurable metrics in the time axis so as to not induce violent and useless social strife, and to avoid angst and hatred amongst peoples.
So how can we apply this to Roe v Wade? Well simplest matter is that freedom is removed from a swath of recognized citizens—women are no longer given constitutional guarantee of abortion. Infants, whether they are citizen and deserve same kind of protection is still up for debate, and plus their action space is so limited that this change in law does not add liberty to them.
Is this fair?
Is there A BETAM solution?